Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Añadir filtros

Base de datos
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año
1.
J Am Acad Dermatol ; 2023 May 22.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2323551

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Distinguishing cutaneous malignant melanoma (CMM) from nevi can be clinically challenging. Suspicious lesions are therefore excised, resulting in many benign lesions being removed surgically to find 1 CMM. It has been proposed to use tape strip derived ribonucleic acid (RNA) to distinguish CMM from nevi. OBJECTIVE: To develop this technique further and validate if RNA profiles can rule out CMM in clinically suspicious lesions with 100% sensitivity. METHODS: Before surgical excision, 200 lesions clinically assessed as CMM were tape stripped. Expression levels of 11 genes on the tapes were investigated by RNA measurement and used in a rule-out test. RESULTS: Histopathology showed that 73 CMMs and 127 non-CMMs were included. Our test correctly identified all CMMs (100% sensitivity) based on the expression levels of 2 oncogenes, PRAME and KIT, relative to a housekeeping gene. Patient age and sample storage time were also significant. Simultaneously, our test correctly excluded CMM in 32% of non-CMM lesions (32% specificity). LIMITATIONS: Our sample contained a very high proportion of CMMs, perhaps due to inclusion during COVID-19 shutdown. Validation in a separate trial must be performed. CONCLUSION: Our results demonstrate that the technique can reduce removal of benign lesions by one-third without overlooking any CMMs.

2.
Contact Dermatitis ; 86(4): 266-275, 2022 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1741353

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Health care workers (HCWs) report frequent adverse skin reactions (ASRs) due to face personal protective equipment (F-PPE) use during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. OBJECTIVES: To describe self-reported ASRs among HCWs using F-PPE; investigate background factors, such as chronic skin diseases and skin types (dry, oily, combination, sensitive), and determine whether HCWs took preventive methods against ASRs. METHODS: An online questionnaire was distributed to 22 993 HCWs at hospitals. RESULTS: The prevalence of ASRs was 61.9% based on 10 287 responders. Different types of F-PPE caused different reactions. The most common ASRs from surgical masks were spots and pimples (37.2%) and from FFP3 masks was red and irritated skin (27.3%). A significantly higher proportion of HCWs with chronic skin diseases had ASRs (71.6%) than those without chronic skin diseases (59.7%) (P < .001). Some skin types were more prone to ASRs (sensitive skin [78.8%] vs dry skin [54.3%]; P = .001). HCWs using F-PPE for >6 hours versus <3 hours per day had a four times higher ASR risk (P = <.001). Nearly all HCWs used preventive and/or counteractive methods (94.2%). CONCLUSIONS: It is important to consider background factors, such as chronic skin diseases and skin types, to prevent and counteract ASRs due to F-PPE use.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto , COVID-19/prevención & control , Estudios Transversales , Dinamarca/epidemiología , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/etiología , Personal de Salud , Hospitales , Humanos , Pandemias/prevención & control , Equipo de Protección Personal/efectos adversos , SARS-CoV-2
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA